Re: Scaling concerns - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Scaling concerns
Date
Msg-id 21940.1166417952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scaling concerns  (tsuraan <tsuraan@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
tsuraan <tsuraan@gmail.com> writes:
> Is the WAL at the same location as the xlog (transaction log?)?

Same thing.

> The checkpoint_segments doc says increasing that value is really only
> useful if the xlog is separate from the data,

Dunno where you read that, but it's utter bilge.  If you've got a
write-intensive workload, you want to crank checkpoint_segments as high
as you can stand.  With the default settings on a modern machine it's
not hard at all to push it into checkpointing every dozen or seconds,
which will completely kill performance.  (Disk space for pg_xlog/ and
potential delay during crash restart are the only negatives here.  If
you are willing to push the average inter-checkpoint interval past five
minutes then you need to increase checkpoint_timeout too.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: tsuraan
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling concerns
Next
From: "Adam Rich"
Date:
Subject: Optimizing timestamp queries? Inefficient Overlaps?