Re: Default Stats Revisited - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Default Stats Revisited
Date
Msg-id 21888.1079032044@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Default Stats Revisited  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Default Stats Revisited
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Well, I'm not 100% opposed to a multiplier.   I'd like to take a poll of DBAs
> to find out which they would find more accessable.   But since most people 
> seem to be ignoring this thread, I'm not sure we'll get much response ...

Maybe you should ask on -admin or -general.  Personally I thought there
wasn't anything to say until someone did some experiments to show
whether an indexed-column differential is really worthwhile and what a
plausible default value would be.  The idea sounds good in the abstract,
but will it really help or just be another useless setting?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] fsync with sync, and Win32 unlink
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Default Stats Revisited