Re: Overhauling GUCS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date
Msg-id 21875.1213122184@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Overhauling GUCS  ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: Overhauling GUCS  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Oh, and wal_buffers, the default for which we should just change if it
> weren't for SHMMAX.

Uh, why?  On a workload of mostly small transactions, what value is
there in lots of wal_buffers?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] Automating our version-stamping a bit better
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal - improve eqsel estimates by including histogram bucket numdistinct statistics