Re: WIP: patch to create explicit support for semi and anti joins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: patch to create explicit support for semi and anti joins
Date
Msg-id 21651.1218733706@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: patch to create explicit support for semi and anti joins  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> OK, that sounds good. Are you also working on transforming NOT IN into
> different form? Or is that the same thing as (1)?

I'm not currently thinking about NOT IN.  It could be transformed to
an antijoin if we could prove that no nulls are involved, but that
seems less than trivial as I noted earlier.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: patch to create explicit support for semi and anti joins
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence