Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version
Date
Msg-id 21645.1062190491@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> Tom, just curious as to what your resistance is to this feature? ISTM
> that making this admin modifiable doesn't hurt anyone and could be
> helpful to some people. 

Admin modifiable at what level?  I don't believe that the "feature" is
valuable enough to warrant defining, implementing, and documenting a GUC
variable, let alone adding a pg_hba.conf column which one could imagine
someone wanting instead.  I suggested a simple source code change, and
I think that's quite sufficient when we have only one request for it
with a not-very-compelling rationale.  There are much more useful tweaks
(eg, altering BLCKSZ) that we have equivalent levels of support for.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version
Next
From: John Battles
Date:
Subject: pgadmin3-0.9.1 wxwindows build woes utils/misc.cpp:389: error: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC