Re: MultiXact member wraparound protections are disabled - Mailing list pgsql-general

root@site-db01a:/var/lib/pgsql/cmates/data # ls pg_multixact/members
0000  0001  0002  0003  0004  0005  0006  0007  0008  0009  000A  000B  000C  000D  000E  000F  0010  0011  0012  0013
0014 0015  0016  0017  0018  0019  001A  001B
 
root@site-db01a:/var/lib/pgsql/cmates/data # ls pg_multixact/offsets
0001  0002  0003  0004  0005  0006  0007  0008  0009  000A  000B



postgres@site-db01a:~ $ /usr/pgsql-9.4/bin/pg_controldata /var/lib/pgsql/cmates/data
pg_control version number:            942
Catalog version number:               201409291
Database system identifier:           6228991221455883206
Database cluster state:               in production
pg_control last modified:             Wed 12 Oct 2016 05:22:45 PM PDT
Latest checkpoint location:           62D0/BDE939F8
Prior checkpoint location:            62CF/F039BFD0
Latest checkpoint's REDO location:    62D0/8A060220
Latest checkpoint's REDO WAL file:    00000001000062D00000008A
Latest checkpoint's TimeLineID:       1
Latest checkpoint's PrevTimeLineID:   1
Latest checkpoint's full_page_writes: on
Latest checkpoint's NextXID:          1/1834305762
Latest checkpoint's NextOID:          19540327
Latest checkpoint's NextMultiXactId:  784503
Latest checkpoint's NextMultiOffset:  1445264
Latest checkpoint's oldestXID:        226141373
Latest checkpoint's oldestXID's DB:   16457
Latest checkpoint's oldestActiveXID:  1834302410
Latest checkpoint's oldestMultiXid:   1
Latest checkpoint's oldestMulti's DB: 16457
Time of latest checkpoint:            Wed 12 Oct 2016 05:22:05 PM PDT
Fake LSN counter for unlogged rels:   0/1
Minimum recovery ending location:     0/0
Min recovery ending loc's timeline:   0
Backup start location:                0/0
Backup end location:                  0/0
End-of-backup record required:        no
Current wal_level setting:            hot_standby
Current wal_log_hints setting:        off
Current max_connections setting:      1500
Current max_worker_processes setting: 8
Current max_prepared_xacts setting:   0
Current max_locks_per_xact setting:   1000
Maximum data alignment:               8
Database block size:                  8192
Blocks per segment of large relation: 131072
WAL block size:                       8192
Bytes per WAL segment:                16777216
Maximum length of identifiers:        64
Maximum columns in an index:          32
Maximum size of a TOAST chunk:        1996
Size of a large-object chunk:         2048
Date/time type storage:               64-bit integers
Float4 argument passing:              by value
Float8 argument passing:              by value
Data page checksum version:           0






On 10/13/16, 5:28 AM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

>AnandKumar, Karthik wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We run postgres 9.4.5.
>> 
>> Starting this morning, we started seeing messages like the below:
>> Oct 12 14:07:15 site-db01a postgres[11253]: [106430-1] app=,user=,db=,ip=LOG:  MultiXact member wraparound
protectionsare disabled because oldest checkpointed MultiXact 1 does not exist on disk
 
>> Oct 12 14:09:26 site-db01a postgres[11253]: [106526-1] app=,user=,db=,ip=LOG:  MultiXact member wraparound
protectionsare disabled because oldest checkpointed MultiXact 1 does not exist on disk
 
>> Oct 12 14:14:18 site-db01a postgres[11253]: [106608-1] app=,user=,db=,ip=LOG:  MultiXact member wraparound
protectionsare disabled because oldest checkpointed MultiXact 1 does not exist on disk
 
>> 
>> Our autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 1750000000.
>> 
>> site=# SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
>>  datname  |    age
>> -----------+------------
>> site      | 1645328344
>> template0 | 1274558807
>> bench     | 1274558807
>> postgres  | 1324283514
>> template1 | 1274558807
>> 
>> So we’re about 100 mil transactions away before we start vacuuming to prevent wraparound.
>> 
>> We’re running precautionary vacuums on our largest offenders to try and drop our transaction ids
>> 
>> What I’d request some clarity on is the message above. What does it mean that "oldest checkpointed MultiXact does
notexist on disk”? Would we lose data if we did have to wrap around?
 
>> 
>> Is this telling us we’re not vacuuming effectively enough?
>
>Ugh.  Can you share the output of pg_controldata and the list of files
>in pg_multixact/members and pg_multixact/offset?
>
>The problem here is that multixact vacuuming is separate from xid
>vacuuming, so you need to be looking at datminmulti rather than
>datfrozenxid.  It may be that multixact wrap around has already
>occurred.
>
>-- 
>Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services