Re: Python 3.1 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Python 3.1 support
Date
Msg-id 21534.1258564018@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.1 support  (Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Python 3.1 support
Re: Python 3.1 support
List pgsql-hackers
Nathan Boley <npboley@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, I am a little skeptical about this patch. I am sorry if this has
> already been discussed, but would this mean that I need to choose
> whether pl/python is built against Python 2.* or Python 3.*?

Yes.  That's exactly what I was complaining about upthread.  I'm not
a Python user, but from what I can gather of the 2-to-3 changes,
having to choose one at package build time is going to be a disaster.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Boley
Date:
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC for adding typmods to functions