Re: Python 3.1 support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Boley
Subject Re: Python 3.1 support
Date
Msg-id 6fa3b6e20911180843i696b8840r5749a28c0a073926@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Python 3.1 support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Python 3.1 support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Python 3.1 support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Again, I'm only one user.  But so far I haven't seen anyone else speak
> up here, and clearly accepting this for inclusion will need nontrivial
> convincing.

Well, FWIW, I am excited about better type integration.

Also, I am a little skeptical about this patch. I am sorry if this has
already been discussed, but would this mean that I need to choose
whether pl/python is built against Python 2.* or Python 3.*?

-Nathan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: Very bad FTS performance with the Polish config
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support