-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Simon Riggs wrote:
>On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 18:49 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> The reason MySQL shows and PostgreSQL doesn't is that there's all
>> kinds of other OSS projects that use MySQL, so it ends up in the door
>> that way. It's also got way more people that know it.
> With the recent TPC-E result and the new async commit functionality, I'm
> hoping to be able to persuade other projects that supporting PostgreSQL
> as well as MySQL is the sensible thing to do.
Well, those thing might help a little bit, but I think the real holdup
here is the lack of simple ports for a lot of existing software. Sure
would be nice if EnterpriseDB and other Postgres-supporting companies
could dedicate a person or two to help out in that regard. A definitive
Postgres Wordpress port would be nice, for example. It would also be nice
is the advocacy group could make a list of software that needs to be ported,
and what the status of any port is. Come to think of it, that would be a
good thing to put on the wiki... done:
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Software_Ports
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200707240947
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFGpgMWvJuQZxSWSsgRA53sAJ0Sr/9c0ZacBeItV3thm4qlxcrFRACdHtFt
SEbYj/vq4xiDCupm+gpypPM=
=bd8H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
