Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From er@xs4all.nl
Subject Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
Date
Msg-id 2122577845.234888.1616324857283@webmailclassic.xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace  (Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
List pgsql-hackers
> On 2021.03.20. 19:48 Gilles Darold <gilles@darold.net> wrote:
>  
> This is a new version of the patch that now implements all the XQUERY
> regexp functions as described in the standard, minus the differences of
> PostgerSQL regular expression explain in [1].
> 
> The standard SQL describe functions like_regex(), occurrences_regex(),
> position_regex(), substring_regex() and translate_regex() which
> correspond to the commonly named functions regexp_like(),
> regexp_count(), regexp_instr(), regexp_substr() and regexp_replace() as
> reported by Chapman Flack in [2]. All these function are implemented in

> [v2-0001-xquery-regexp-functions.patch]

Hi,

Apply, compile and (world)check are fine. I haven't found errors in functionality.

I went through the docs, and came up with these changes in func.sgml, and pg_proc.dat.

Useful functions - thanks!

Erik Rijkers
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects