Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?
Date
Msg-id 20806.1189744295@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?
Re: RETURNING and DO INSTEAD ... Intentional or not?
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> FYI, after some tinkering around, I've found that RETURNING is 100% 
> incompatible with any table which has conditional DO INSTEAD rules; there's 
> just no way to make it work and return any intelligible data.  This would be 
> a completely corner case, except that people use conditional DO INSTEAD rules
> heavily with partitioning (and yes, real users are complaining).

Those would be real users who are not on any PG mailing list?  Cause I
have not seen any complaints, much less any proposals for a solution...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: tsearch2 documentation done