Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date
Msg-id 20805.1271298105@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> OK, how about "connection not authorized by pg_hba.conf"?

This is still not especially helpful for novice DBAs.  We want to point
them in the direction that they need to add an entry to pg_hba.conf,
which is 99% likely to be what's wanted.  The current wording provides
that hint; vague statements like the above don't.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: walreceiver is uninterruptible on win32
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: How to generate specific WAL records?