Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Koichi Suzuki <koichi.szk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2010/4/14 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>:
>
> >> It would be a very useful test case to publish.
>
> > I'm still struggling to generate remaing WAL records.
>
> Sure, but when you've got it all, please share. I'd like to see us
> have a much larger set of tests than the "make check" regression
> tests which would get run less frequently but test a lot more. This
> sounds like a good one to include.
Agreed. This test belongs in our CVS tree so we can maintain it as we
add new WAL types.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
