"Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
> This thread has associated CF entry which is marked as RwF [0]. But the change proved to be useful [1] in
understandingwhat we can expect from time source.
> It was requested many times before [2,3]. Reading through this thread it seems to me that my questions about
applicationof the pg_test_timing somehow switched focus from this patch. However, I'd appreciate if it was applied.
Nanosecondsseem important to me.
> Let me know if I can help in any way. Thanks!
Basically, I think the code is ready, but I was awaiting Hannu's
proposal on rewriting the documentation for pg_test_timing.
Do you want to have a go at that?
regards, tom lane
