Re: Parallel Scan Bug: invalid attnum: 0 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Parallel Scan Bug: invalid attnum: 0
Date
Msg-id 20679.1478795742@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Scan Bug: invalid attnum: 0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Parallel Scan Bug: invalid attnum: 0
List pgsql-bugs
I wrote:
> Immediate impression is that the logic for planning partial grouped
> aggregation did not get the zero-sort-keys case right.

Yeah: after flattening your view, the planner was left with GROUP BY
'S3'::character varying, which is a no-op, but it mistakenly inserted
a no-op Sort into the plan to sort by that.  One-liner fix is here
if you need it right away:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=3Dpostgresql.git;a=3Dcommitdiff;h=3D7=
defc3b97a31537547053946808a83e7234d1b61


            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Scan Bug: invalid attnum: 0
Next
From: jg@pailloncy.com
Date:
Subject: BUG #14417: Cache invalidation ?