Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?
Date
Msg-id 20606.1137261456@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?  ("Steven Mooij" <steven@mooij.name>)
Responses Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?
Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?
List pgsql-bugs
"Steven Mooij" <steven@mooij.name> writes:
> testsearch=> insert into t_documentword2 (SELECT document_id, t_word2.id,
> frequency from t_documentword, t_word2 where t_documentword.word =
> t_word2.word);
> server closed the connection unexpectedly

There's not enough information here to guess what the problem is.
(But it's not table size; people routinely manipulate tables much
bigger than that in Postgres.)  A stack trace from the core dump
would be really helpful, or even better a self-contained test case
that other people could replicate the failure with.  See the bug
reporting guidelines at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/bug-reporting.html

> I got the same result in version 7.5.15.

There is no version of Postgres named 7.5.anything.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #2000: psql does not prompt for password
Next
From: "Lee Thompson"
Date:
Subject: BUG #2170: --rpath option is skipping shared libs