Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Date
Msg-id 20601.1119018899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> It wouldn't just be "default to connect to", it would also be "location
> for tools to store cluster-wide information". Which makes pg_system a
> slightly more reasonable name in that context, but i certainly have no
> problem with "default" as a name.

Well, where a tool chooses to install stuff is the business of that
tool; there isn't any particular reason to think that default would
suddenly become a preferred choice, I think.

I dislike the name pg_system because it implies that that DB is somehow
special from the point of view of the system ... which is exactly what
it would *not* be.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum in the backend