Re: Bucket and batch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bucket and batch
Date
Msg-id 20577.1214870084@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Bucket and batch  ("Ana Carolina Brito de Almeida" <anacrl@ig.com.br>)
Responses Re: Bucket and batch  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Ana Carolina Brito de Almeida" <anacrl@ig.com.br> writes:
> So, I would like to know the differences between bucket and batch.

A bucket is, well, one bucket of a hash table --- it holds all the
tuples that have the same hash code (for as many bits of the hash
code as we are choosing to use).  We try to size the hash table with
enough buckets so there's not more than 10 tuples per bucket on
average.

A batch is a range of buckets that we process at the same time.  Tuples
(from either side of the join) whose hash codes show they fall into
batches other than the first one get dumped into temporary holding
files, and then (after finishing joining the first batch) we pull each
successive batch back into memory and join that portion of the tuples.
The batch size is chosen to make the amount of memory needed be
approximately work_mem.

IOW, there are really nbuckets * nbatches "virtual" buckets in the hash
table, but only nbuckets worth of them are kept in memory at any one
time.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Does anything dump per-database config settings? (was Re: ALTER DATABASE vs pg_dump)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)