=?UTF-8?B?5q2j5Y2O5ZCV?= <kainwen@gmail.com> writes:
> Recently read the code, I find that when calling DefineIndex
> from ProcessUtilitySlow, is_alter_table will be set true if
> this statement is came from expandTableLikeClause.
Yeah.
> Based on the above, I think we can always a false value
> for is_alter_table when DefineIndex is called from
> ProcessUtilitySlow.
Why do you think this is an improvement? Even if it's correct,
the code savings is so negligible that I'm not sure I want to
expend brain cells on figuring out whether it's correct. The
comment you want to remove does not suggest that it's optional
which value we should pass, so I think the burden of proof
is to show that this patch is okay not that somebody else
has to demonstrate that it isn't.
regards, tom lane
