Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you're going to give a formula, why not just give a formula, eg
> You mean like this:
> http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/kernel-resources.html
Yeah, more or less. A couple thoughts now that I see it worked out:
* Combining the entries for max_connections and autovacuum_max_workers
is probably just making it look more complicated than it needs to.
How about two rows that just happen to have similar formulas, viz
max_connections (1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * max_connections
autovacuum_max_workers (1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * autovacuum_max_workers
* The right-hand column header should be something like "Approximate
shared memory bytes..." to avoid the impression that these formulas
are meant to be exact.
* If we do it like this then the left-hand column is really redundant,
not to say wrong because the right-hand formulas depend on more than
the single variable mentioned. How about something like
Table 17-2 PostgreSQL shared memory usage
Purpose Approximate number of bytes required (as of 8.3)
Per-connection state (1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * max_connections
Autovacuum worker state (1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * autovacuum_max_workers
Prepared transaction state ...
Shared disk buffers ...
WAL buffers ...
Fixed space requirements 770kB
regards, tom lane
