Tom Lane-2 wrote: > > This is a server-side behavior, not JDBC's fault. It's been like that > for ten years and is unlikely to be changed. See prior discussions, > for instance here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-03/msg00179.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-07/msg00416.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-10/msg00908.php > So it seems, based on this last link, that commit now returns a "ROLLBACK" in this case. So then why doesn't JDBC throw an exception when a commit returns "ROLLBACK"? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/committing-an-aborted-transaction-tp20519423p20520062.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - jdbc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
pgsql-jdbc by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных