Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work
Date
Msg-id 20445.1149878549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Responses Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Are we still going to subtract out the gettimeofday overhead?

> I was always more excited about that than the sampling aspect. I've run into
> queries where EXPLAIN ANALYZE results were deceptive due to the gettimeofday
> overhead but I've never run into a query where gettimeofday overhead made
> running the query under EXPLAIN ANALYZE impractical.

That would be deceptive in a different way, ie, make it look like there
was a whole bunch of outside-the-plan overhead.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD/DROP constraints
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: ADD/DROP constraints