Re: PostgreSQL insert speed tests - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: PostgreSQL insert speed tests
Date
Msg-id 20372.1077902870@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL insert speed tests  (Sezai YILMAZ <sezai.yilmaz@pro-g.com.tr>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL insert speed tests
List pgsql-general
Sezai YILMAZ <sezai.yilmaz@pro-g.com.tr> writes:
> I changed the three hash indexes to btree.
> The performance is increased about 2 times (in PostgreSQL 7.3.4  1905
> rows/s).
> Concurrent inserts now work.

Concurrent inserts should work with hash indexes in 7.4, though not 7.3.

The slowdown you report probably is due to the rewrite of hash indexing
to allow more concurrency --- the locking algorithm is more complex than
it used to be.  I am surprised that the effect is so large though.
Could you make your test program available?

> Changed indexes are more suitable for hash type.

Are they?  How many distinct values are there in those columns?
I suspect that your test may be stressing the case where only a few hash
buckets are used and each bucket chain gets to be very long.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "dewins murillo"
Date:
Subject: Here there is a Postgresql for Windows Sample APP
Next
From: Michael Chaney
Date:
Subject: Re: correlated delete with 'in' and 'left outer join'