Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
Date
Msg-id 202510251627.jlbqh4qzgvnr@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?  (Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2024-Sep-26, Florents Tselai wrote:

> Attached an idea.
> The A/B example may be wordy / redundant,

Yeah, it seems a little wordy to me, how about something like the
attached?

> but the -e note on the distinction between installing binaries / creating
> an extension I think it's important.

Hmm, ok, but I think that's a slightly unrelated topic because the shlib
is not a database object.  Maybe it would be more appropriate to add a
mention of this directly in the docs for -e instead of trying to cram it
in the note about other database objects.  I'll wait for you to propose
something for that part.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue