Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
Date
Msg-id CAApHDvqG7_ctYrdhLv+v5W9561kyHsEv7GZrgHGCmVux9KK7+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>)
Responses Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 at 05:32, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> On 2024-Sep-26, Florents Tselai wrote:
> > but the -e note on the distinction between installing binaries / creating
> > an extension I think it's important.
>
> Hmm, ok, but I think that's a slightly unrelated topic because the shlib
> is not a database object.  Maybe it would be more appropriate to add a
> mention of this directly in the docs for -e instead of trying to cram it
> in the note about other database objects.  I'll wait for you to propose
> something for that part.

This seems to be waiting on Florents. I've adjusted the CF entry to
reflect that.

Florents, are you planning on coming back to this?

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Checking join outer relation uniqueness to prevent unnecessary memoization
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Typos in the code and README