Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Date
Msg-id 202507171111.uo3vvgt6jp6j@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall  (Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Jul-17, Mahendra Singh Thalor wrote:

> To pg_restore, we are giving a dump of pg_dumpall which has a
> global.dat file and we have drop commands in the global.dat file so
> when we are using 'globals-only', we are dropping databases as we have
> DROP commands.
> As of now, we don't have any filter for global.dat file in restore. If
> a user wants to restore only globals(without droping db), then they
> should use 'globals-only' in pg_dumpall.
> Or if we don't want to DROP databases by global.dat file, then we
> should add a filter in pg_restore (hard to implement as we have SQL
> commands in global.dat file). 

I think dropping database is dangerous and makes no practical sense;
doing it renders pg_dumpall --clean completely unusable.  You're arguing
from the point of view of ease of implementation, but that doesn't help
users.  

> I think, for this case, we can do some
> more doc changes.
> Example: pg_restore --globals-only : this will restore the global.dat
> file(including all drop commands). It might drop databases if any drop
> commands.

I don't think doc changes are useful.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera               48°01'N 7°57'E  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I love the Postgres community. It's all about doing things _properly_. :-)"
(David Garamond)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Hennessy
Date:
Subject: Re: simple patch for discussion
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication