On 2025-Jul-07, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I am wondering whether we should question the restriction on using
> format macros because of translations.
Sure Mr. Quixote, the windmills are over there.
> In fact, these format macros can actually aid translations e.g. if the
> translation sees LSN_FORMAT instead of %X/%X, it can use that
> knowledge to better translate the message since it knows that it's an
> LSN instead of two sets of hex numbers separated by /. If we could
> devise a prefix which will tell them that what comes next is a FORMAT
> for a special datatype, would the translation system be able to make
> use of this information.
You'd have to talk with the gettext developers and then wait a decade or
so for all the live distributions get a patched gettext release. For
GNU gettext, this is explained at the bottom of this page:
https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/No-string-concatenation.html
I frankly wouldn't waste my time.
Meanwhile, crake is failing the cross-version upgrade test because of
this change, and I'm not sure what solution I'm going to offer. Maybe
use the AdjustUpgrade.pm infrastructure to set all the pg_lsn column
values to NULL if the old version is earlier than 19 and the new version
is 19 or later :-)
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Syntax error: function hell() needs an argument.
Please choose what hell you want to involve.
