Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Álvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands
Date
Msg-id 202502041903.tbp7krui4kq6@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Better title output for psql \dt \di etc. commands
List pgsql-hackers
On 2025-Feb-04, Tom Lane wrote:

> =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > At this point I would just add a "translator:" comment that explains
> > that the ??? bit is for unexpected cases and can be translated in the
> > same way.
> 
> Hmm, do we have a standard policy or comment wording about that?
> I looked for "translator: ... unexpected" and didn't find any
> existing comments of that sort.

I don't remember cases of messages of that kind marked for translation,
so I'm not surprised that we don't have any such comments.  Those would
typically be elog() or the errfoo_internal() cases, I think.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El sudor es la mejor cura para un pensamiento enfermo" (Bardia)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: hash_search_with_hash_value is high in "perf top" on a replica
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: add missing PQfinish() calls to vacuumdb