Re: Incremental Backups in postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From akp geek
Subject Re: Incremental Backups in postgres
Date
Msg-id 2024a9fb0911101425g5e275688j3592fa7208ce621c@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incremental Backups in postgres  (silly8888 <silly8888@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
I have set up the replication using Bucardo. This is just an additional set up
 
regards

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, silly8888 <silly8888@gmail.com> wrote:
How about using replication instead of incremental backups?

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@simkin.ca> wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009, akp geek <akpgeek@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So Is it always good to have the backup using PG_dump instead of PITR or
>> a combination of both
>>
>
> I like to do both. Ongoing PITR, daily base backups (by updating an rsync
> copy), and weekly pg_dumps that in turn go to tape.
>
> PITR gives a very recent restore point in the event of server loss. As
> previously mentioned, the full (custom) backups let you restore individual
> tables. They're also a lot smaller than base backups + WAL logs.
>
> --
> "No animals were harmed in the recording of this episode. We tried but that
> damn monkey was just too fast."
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Richard Broersma
Date:
Subject: Re: Editor for sgml files
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.3.8 on AIX5.3 : compilation failed