On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:37:38 -0700
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 8, 2024, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> > "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Tuesday, October 8, 2024, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 11:10:37 +0900
> > >> Shinya Kato <Shinya11.Kato@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> > >>> When SQL scripts created with pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore are
> > executed
> > >>> in psql with AUTOCOMMIT turned off, they will not succeed in many
> > cases.
> >
> > > Agreed. If we aren’t already outputting psql-only stuff I am a strong -1
> > > for making this the first such case.
> >
> > I really doubt that this is the only way in which you can break a
> > pg_dump script by executing it in a non-default psql environment.
> > We'd likely be better advised to spend some documentation effort
> > recommending that pg_dump scripts be executed under "psql --no-psqlrc".
>
>
> +1
>
> Reinforcing that our output script basically assumes a default execution
> environment seems worth mentioning even if it seems self-evident once it’s
> said.
+1
Regards,
Yugo Nagata
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
