On 2024-Aug-13, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> That means - after getting the live partitions from
> prune_append_rel_partitions(), by the time the code tries to lock a
> child, it's already dropped.
Right.
> However, similar check is not there in expand_partitioned_rtentry().
> Introducing the same check will fix the issue. But, I don't know how
> it affects the pruning part as this partition couldn't be pruned
> earlier and that's why we're opening the child partition.
Hmm, we could just remove the partition from the set of live partitions
-- then it should behave the same as if the partition had been pruned.
Something like the attached, perhaps.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"In fact, the basic problem with Perl 5's subroutines is that they're not
crufty enough, so the cruft leaks out into user-defined code instead, by
the Conservation of Cruft Principle." (Larry Wall, Apocalypse 6)
