Hi,
On 2024-03-19 17:39:39 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> My own pet docs peeve is a purely editorial one: func.sgml is a 30k line
> beast, and I think there's a good case for splitting out at least the
> larger chunks of it.
I think we should work on generating a lot of func.sgml. Particularly the
signature etc should just come from pg_proc.dat, it's pointlessly painful to
generate that by hand. And for a lot of the functions we should probably move
the existing func.sgml comments to the description in pg_proc.dat.
I suspect that we can't just generate all the documentation from pg_proc,
because of xrefs etc. Although perhaps we could just strip those out for
pg_proc.
We'd need to add some more metadata to pg_proc, for grouping kinds of
functions together. But that seems doable.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
