Hi,
On 2024-04-11 20:46:02 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I hope this work is targeting pg18.
I think anything of the scope discussed by Melanie would be very clearly
targeting 18. For 17, I don't know yet whether we should revert the the
ANALYZE streaming read user (041b96802ef), just do a bit of comment polishing,
or some other small change.
One oddity is that before 041b96802ef, the opportunities for making the
interface cleaner were less apparent, because c6fc50cb4028 increased the
coupling between analyze.c and the way the table storage works.
> Otherwise, do I get this right that this post feature-freeze works on
> designing a new API? Yes, 27bc1772fc masked the problem. But it was
> committed on Mar 30.
Note that there were versions of the patch that were targeting the
pre-27bc1772fc interface.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
