On 2024-04-07 16:52:05 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 7 Apr 2024, at 14:51, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 2024-04-06 Sa 20:49, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> >> That's probably unnecessary optimization, but it seems a tad silly to read an
> >> entire, potentially sizable, file to just use the last 1k. Not sure if the way
> >> slurp_file() uses seek supports negative ofsets, the docs read to me like that
> >> may only be supported with SEEK_END.
> >
> > We should enhance slurp_file() so it uses SEEK_END if the offset is negative.
>
> Absolutely agree. Reading the thread I think Andres argues for not printing
> anything at all in this case but we should support negative offsets anyways, it
> will fort sure come in handy.
I'm ok with printing path + some content or just the path.
- Andres