Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c
Date
Msg-id 20240129181249.GA3669306@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 01:24:19PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> I see that I was planning on back-patching this to v16, but since
>> is_valid_ascii() was introduced in v15, I'm wondering if it'd be better to
>> back-patch it there so that is_valid_ascii() lives in the same file for all
>> versions where it exists.  Thoughts?
> 
> Yeah, if we're going to back-patch at all, that probably makes sense.

Committed/back-patched.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup