Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c
Date
Msg-id 1011184.1706293459@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c
List pgsql-hackers
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> I see that I was planning on back-patching this to v16, but since
> is_valid_ascii() was introduced in v15, I'm wondering if it'd be better to
> back-patch it there so that is_valid_ascii() lives in the same file for all
> versions where it exists.  Thoughts?

Yeah, if we're going to back-patch at all, that probably makes sense.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add sortsupport for range types and btree_gist
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes