Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date
Msg-id 20240129182130.GA3670200@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 10:31:09AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 11:00:01AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
>> I'm discouraged by "\n1" in the file name and in the
>> "examining summary..." message.
>> regress_log_002_blocks from the following successful test run on the same
>> sungazer node contains:
>> [15:21:58.924](0.106s) # examining summary for TLI 1 from 0/155BAE0 to 0/155E750
>> [15:21:58.925](0.001s) ok 1 - WAL summary file exists
> 
> Ah, I think this query:
> 
>     SELECT tli, start_lsn, end_lsn from pg_available_wal_summaries()
>         WHERE tli = $summarized_tli AND end_lsn > '$summarized_lsn'
> 
> is returning more than one row in some cases.  I attached a quick sketch of
> an easy way to reproduce the issue as well as one way to fix it.

The buildfarm just caught a failure with the new logging in place:

    https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2024-01-29%2018%3A09%3A10

I'm not totally sure my "fix" is correct, but I think this does confirm the
theory.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Hide exposed impl detail of wchar.c
Next
From: "Andrey M. Borodin"
Date:
Subject: Re: UUID v7