pg_upgrade's object listing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject pg_upgrade's object listing
Date
Msg-id 20231027.142055.2043576265101382819.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses RE: pg_upgrade's object listing
Re: pg_upgrade's object listing
List pgsql-hackers
Hello.

I found the following message recently introduced in pg_upgrade:

>        pg_log(PG_VERBOSE, "slot_name: \"%s\", plugin: \"%s\", two_phase: %s",
>               slot_info->slotname,
>               slot_info->plugin,
>               slot_info->two_phase ? "true" : "false");

If the labels correspond to the struct member names, the first label
ought to be "slotname". If not, all labels of this type, including
those adjucent, should have a more natural spelling.

What do you think about this?

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: A recent message added to pg_upgade