Hello.
I found the following message recently introduced in pg_upgrade:
> pg_log(PG_VERBOSE, "slot_name: \"%s\", plugin: \"%s\", two_phase: %s",
> slot_info->slotname,
> slot_info->plugin,
> slot_info->two_phase ? "true" : "false");
If the labels correspond to the struct member names, the first label
ought to be "slotname". If not, all labels of this type, including
those adjucent, should have a more natural spelling.
What do you think about this?
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center