Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2023-08-12 15:50:24 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Thanks.  I realised that it's easy enough to test that theory about
> cleanup locks by hacking ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup() to return
> false randomly.  Then the test occasionally fails as described.  Seems
> like we'll need to fix that test, but it's not evidence of a server
> bug, and my signal handler refactoring patch is in the clear.  Thanks
> for testing it!

WRT fixing the test: I think just using VACUUM FREEZE ought to do the job?
After changing all the VACUUMs to VACUUM FREEZEs, 031_recovery_conflict.pl
passes even after I make ConditionalLockBufferForCleanup() fail 100%.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance degradation on concurrent COPY into a single relation in PG16.
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner