Hi,
On 2023-07-24 09:42:44 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > I don't know this code at all, but I hope that this can be solved with
> > just Anton's proposed patch.
>
> Yes, it's just that off-by-one. I need to check if there's a similar bug for
> local / temp table buffers though.
Doesn't appear that way. We *do* fail if there's only 1 remaining buffer, but
we already did before my change (because we also need to pin the fsm). I don't
think that's an issue worth worrying about, if all-1 of local buffers are
pinned, you're going to have problems.
Thanks Anton / Victoria for the report and fix. Pushed.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
