On 2023-Jul-04, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 07:46:27PM +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Perhaps we could have autovacuum check for it, and do it
> > separately of vacuum proper.)
>
> Being able to reuse some of the worker/launcher parts from autovacuum
> could make things easier for a bgworker implementation, perhaps?
TBH I don't understand what you are thinking about.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I can see support will not be a problem. 10 out of 10." (Simon Wittber)
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2004-12/msg00159.php)
