Re: Protecting allocator headers with Valgrind - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Protecting allocator headers with Valgrind
Date
Msg-id 20230415152558.GA1363788@rfd.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Protecting allocator headers with Valgrind  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Protecting allocator headers with Valgrind
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 01:28:08AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> Any objections?

Not objecting.  I think the original Valgrind integration refrained from this
because it would have added enough Valgrind client requests to greatly slow
Valgrind runs.  Valgrind reduced the cost of client requests in later years,
so this new conclusion is reasonable.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add jit deform_counter
Next
From: Miroslav Bendik
Date:
Subject: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop)