On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 01:56:24PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 12:42:20PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> > ah right I should have checked. but the same ABI compatibility concern
> > still exists for version 1.0 of the extension.
>
> Yes, we'd better make sure that the past code is able to run, at
> least. Now I am not really convinced that we have the need to enforce
> an error with the new code even if 1.0 is still installed,
So keep this "deprecated" C function working, as it would only be a few lines
of code?
> so as it is
> possible to remove all the traces of the code that triggers errors if
> an end LSN is higher than the current insert LSN for primaries or
> replayed LSN for standbys.
+1 for that
