Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro Horiguchi
Subject Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)
Date
Msg-id 20230306.154843.178021884584228317.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)  (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
At Mon, 06 Mar 2023 15:24:25 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in 
> In any case, I think we need to avoid such concurrent autovacuum/analyze.

If it is correct, I believe the attached fix works.

regads.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher
Next
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand"
Date:
Subject: Re: Reconcile stats in find_tabstat_entry() and get rid of PgStat_BackendFunctionEntry