Uggg!
At Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:48:10 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> At Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:20:39 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While doing something I should not have done, I have been able to
> > trigger latch.c with the error of $subject. Adding in the elog
> > generated some information about the PID owning the latch and
> > MyProcPid has made me understand immediately why I was wrong. Would
> > there be any objections to add more information in this case?
> >
> > The attached patch does so.
> > Thanks,
>
> Please tidy up the followging sentence properly and natural but in a moderately formal way, within the context of
computerprograms, and provide explanations for the individual changes you made.
Please ignore the following sentense. It is an extra sentence
mistakenly copy-pasted in.
> +1 for adding that information, I'm afraid that MyProcId is not
> necessary since it is displayed in log lines in most cases. If you
> want to display the both PIDs I suggest making them more distinctive.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
