Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
Date
Msg-id 20230214222332.GB1350572@nathanxps13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:47:12PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Not really related: I do wonder how often we end up self deadlocking in
> quickdie(), due to the ereport() not beeing reentrant. We'll "fix" it soon
> after, due to postmasters SIGKILL.  Perhaps we should turn on
> send_abort_for_kill on CI?

+1, this seems like it'd be useful in general.  I'm guessing this will
require a bit of work on the CI side to generate the backtrace.

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Change xl_hash_vacuum_one_page.ntuples from int to uint16
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we do something to help stop users mistakenly using force_parallel_mode?