Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
Date
Msg-id 20230214011343.ddnx35jrhl4mm7lm@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023-02-14 10:05:40 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> What do you think about the need for explicitly specifying the
> default?  I'm fine with specifying the default using a single word,
> such as WAIT_FOR_REMOTE_FLUSH.

We obviously shouldn't force the option to be present. Why would we want to
break existing clients unnecessarily?  Without it the behaviour should be
unchanged from today's.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Next
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL test scenario in 003_check_guc.pl