Hi,
On 2023-02-10 11:26:21 +0000, Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v34] Time-delayed logical replication subscriber
>
> Similar to physical replication, a time-delayed copy of the data for
> logical replication is useful for some scenarios (particularly to fix
> errors that might cause data loss).
>
> This patch implements a new subscription parameter called 'min_apply_delay'.
Sorry for not reading through the thread, but it's very long.
Has there been any discussion about whether this is actually best implemented
on the client side? You could alternatively implement it on the sender.
That'd have quite a few advantages, I think - you e.g. wouldn't remove the
ability to *receive* and send feedback messages. We'd not end up filling up
the network buffer with data that we'll not process anytime soon.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
