Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dmitry Dolgov
Subject Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions
Date
Msg-id 20230127151841.2vbcemntn2ng57kw@ddolgov.remote.csb
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions  (David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Lazy JIT IR code generation to increase JIT speed with partitions
List pgsql-hackers
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:02:32AM +0100, David Geier wrote:
> It's very curious as to why we didn't really see that when dumping the
> bitcode. It seems like the bitcode is always different enough to not spot
> that.

As I've noted off-list, there was noticeable difference in the dumped
bitcode, which I haven't noticed since we were talking mostly about
differences between executions of the same query.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: old_snapshot_threshold bottleneck on replica
Next
From: Isaac Morland
Date:
Subject: Re: Set arbitrary GUC options during initdb