At Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:45:36 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in
> Personally, I would prefer the above LOGs to be in reverse order as it
> doesn't make much sense to me to first say that we are skipping
> changes and then say the transaction is delayed. What do you think?
In the first place, I misunderstood maybe_start_skipping_changes(),
which doesn't actually skip changes. So... sorry for the noise.
For the record, I agree that the current order is right.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
